Collaborative Curriculum Design through Engineering Research and Innovation in Science Education
Abstract
This article analyses collaborative curriculum design through engineering research and innovation in science education in rural and urban secondary schools in Delta. The descriptive survey design was used with two research questions and one hypothesis. The population consists of classroom teachers from rural and urban public secondary schools from 425 public secondary schools from 25 Local Government Areas (L.G.A) in Delta State, Nigeria. A sample of two teachers per school was extracted from 58 schools bringing the total to 116 teachers randomly sampled. Frequency, percentages, and means, (based on a four-point scale) were used for the research questions, and one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for the statistical significance of the research hypothesis, based on a reliability test coefficient of 0.86 at 0.05 level of significance. The study submits that classroom teachers were being confined and restricted not to teach outside the curriculum for grading and examination purposes and that only to a low extent does the classroom teacher influence or model the curriculum through engineering research and innovation to direct learning outcome of the students in science education in rural and urban secondary schools in Delta State.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adesugba, A. & Temitope, T. (2019) Curriculum development and multicultural education in the Nigerian educational system, Journal of Scientific Research and Studies Vol. 6(4), pp. 46-53, July, ISSN 2375-8791
Barnett, R., (2000) “Super Complexity and the Curriculumâ€. Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 255- 265.
Bhagat, Rakesh. (2018). Introduction to Science. Research Gate Publishers, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329321111_Introduction_to_Science
Byers, C., (2005) “Defining, Developing, and Implementing a New Design for the Technology Component of a Human Resource Development Undergraduate Programmeâ€. Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 235-245,
Bohmann, L., Sorby, S. Johnson, D., Mattila, K. and Sutherland, J., (2007) “A Model Curriculum for Service Systems Engineering†American Society for Engineering Education.
Blumenthal P. and Grothus, U., (2016) “Developing Global Competence in Engineering Students: the US and German Approachesâ€. Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2008 Article1. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol3/iss2/1/, Accessed 22 August.
Drexler, K. E. (1992) Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing, and Computation. Wiley/Interscience, pp.493-4.
Hazelkorn E., Ryan, C., Beernaert, Y., Constantinou, C. P., Deca, L., Grangeat, M., Karikorpi, M., Lazoudis, A., Casulleras, R.P., Welzel-Breuer, M. (2015), Science Education for Responsible Citizenship; Report to the European Commission of the Expert Group on Science Education; Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Science with and for Society, EUR 26893 EN
Heywood, J., (2005) “Engineering Education: Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction†Wiley-Interscience: U.S.A.
Hohenberg, P. C. (2010). What is Science? Retrieved from http://physics.nyu.edu/~pch2/What_is_Scien%09ce-December_2010a.pdfNew
Kapur R (2018). Formulation of objectives in curriculum development.
Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323694981_Formulation_of
_Objectives_in_Curriculum_Development/download
Lam L (2014) “About science 1: Basics—knowledge, Nature, science and scimat,†in All About Science: Philosophy, History, Sociology & Communication, eds. Burguete, M. & Lam, L. (World Scientific, Singapore)
Mbajiorgu, N. and Reid, N., (2006) “Factors Affecting Curriculum Development in Chemistryâ€. Higher Education Academy, Hull.
Mohanasundaram, K. (2018) Curriculum Design and Development, Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(Suppl. 1) S4-S6, ISSN 2519-9412, Phoenix Research Publishers.
National Academy of Sciences, (NAS), (2008), Science, Evolution and Creationism, NAS Press, Washington, DC.
OECD (2009) Results: What Students Know and Can Do. Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (Volume I), Paris: OECD, p128.
Parashar, A. K. and Parashar, R. (2012), Innovations and Curriculum Development for Engineering Education and Research in India; International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (ICTLHE 2012) in conjunction with RCEE & RHED, Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Centre of Engineering Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.704, Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Raide´n, A. and Dainty, A., (2006) “Human Resource Development in Construction Organisations an Example of a “chaordic†Learning Organisation?†The Learning Organisation, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 63-79.
Saha, S. K, (2010), “Curriculum Design of Mechanical Engineering in a Developing Countryâ€. 3rd International Symposium for Engineering Education, , University College Cork, Ireland
Science Europe (2013) Science Europe Roadmap, Brussels: Science Europe, p25. http://www.scienceeurope.org/uploads/Public DocumentsAndSpeeches/ScienceEurope_ Roadmap.pdf
Triki, N. M. (2016), Innovations and Curriculum Development for Technical and Engineering Education in Libya; Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), Volume 7, Issue 4, December
Walkington, J., (2002) “Curriculum Change in Engineeringâ€. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 133 – 148.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.