Effect of Sequential Multiple Representations (SMR) on the Academic Achievement of Senior Secondary School Students in Electric Circuit
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of Sequential Multiple Representations in Enhancing Senior Secondary School Physics Students’ Achievement in Electric circuits. The intervention involved a sequence of four lessons conducted over a period of 6 weeks, with the first and last week used for pre and post-test. The intervention was set deliberately to push students to use multiple representations in a particular sequence (starting from word to symbols, diagram, and then generating equations) to solve electric circuit problems. Two research questions and two hypotheses were set up to guide the study. A quasi-experimental research design of a pre-test post-test non-equivalent control group was used for the study. The population of the study comprised all 3600 students offering physics in the fifteen public co-educational senior secondary schools in the Bauchi metropolis. The sample size of the study was 86 using multi-stage sampling. The instrument used for data collection was a Physics Problem-Solving Task on Electric Circuit (PPSTEC) with a reliability coefficient of 0.76. The research questions were answered using mean and standard deviation while the hypotheses were tested using ANCOVA at 0.05 significance level. The findings of the study indicate that SMR can be effective in enhancing students’ achievement in physics and there was no gender difference when students were taught using SMR. Based on the finding it was concluded that the use of sequential multiple representations as a teaching strategy is an effective tool for enhancing students’ achievement. The research, therefore, recommends further research with different sets of students, and in different contexts across Nigeria to provide more empirical evidence on the role of sequential multiple representations as a means of developing students’ problem-solving skills in electric circuit problems.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adadan, E., Irving, K. E., & Trundle, K. C. (2009). Impacts of multiple representational instruction on high school students’ conceptual understanding of the particulate nature of matter. International journal of science Education. 31, 1743-1755.
Erinosho, S. Y. (2013). How do students perceive the difficulty of physics in secondary school? An exploratory study in Nigeria. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 3(3), 1510-1515.
Haratua T. M. S. & Judyanto S. (2016). Representations based physics Instruction to enable students problem-solving. American Journal of Educational Research, 2016 4(1), 1-4
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems. A hand book for designing problem-solving learning environments. (Routledge, New York).
Kohl, P. B. & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics, Physics Education Research, 4, 010111.
Kohl, P. B., Rosengrant, D. & Finkelstein, N. D. (2007). Strongly and weakly directed approaches to learning of multiple representation use in physics. Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research, 3(1), 1-10. http://doi.org/10.1103/phy-STER. 3.010108
Mekonnen, S. (2014). Problems challenging the academic performance of physics students’ in higher governmental institutions in the case of Arbaminch, Wolayita, sodo, Hawasa and Dila Universities. 6(5).
Metioui, A. C. (2012). Acquiring knowledge in learning concepts from electrical circuits. The use of multiple representations in technology-based learning environments. Systemic, Cybernetics and Informatics. 10(2). ISSN: 1690-4524
NERDC (2004) National Policy on Education, National Educational Research and Development Centre: Abuja: NERDC Press.
Nieminen, P., Savinainen, A. & Virri, J. (2012). Gender difference in learning of the concept of force, representational consistency and scientific reasoning. International journal of science and mathematics education. 11, 1137-1156.
Rosengrant, D., Van Heuvelen, A. & Etkina, E. (2009). Free body diagrams: Necessary or sufficient. AIP Conference proceedings. 790(1)
Waldrip, B. & Prain, V. (2006). Changing representation to learn primary science concepts. Teaching Science, 52(4), 17-21.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.