Changes in Students’ Problem-Solving Skills: The Role of a Focused Teaching Intervention Based on Sequential Multiple Representations (SMR)

Suleiman Musa Bala, Saadatu Abubakar Muhammad, Musa Olanrewaju Dauda

Abstract


This study was set to investigate the role of Sequential Multiple Representations in Enhancing Senior Secondary School Physics Students’ Problem-Solving Skills in the context of a tightly focused teaching intervention. The intervention involved a sequence of four lessons conducted over a period of 6 weeks, with the first and last week used for pre and post-test. The intervention was set deliberately to push students to use multiple representations in a particular sequence (starting from word to symbols, diagram, and then generating equations) to solve electric circuit problems. The population of the study comprised of all students offering physics in the fifteen public senior secondary schools in Bauchi state, Nigeria. Cluster random sampling technique was used to select 40 students which constituted the sample size. The instrument used for data collection was a Physics Problem-Solving Task on Electric Circuit (PPSTEC) with a reliability coefficient of 0.76. An assessment rubric was developed by the researcher with four (4) levels of attainment of problem-solving skills (No attempt, Problematic, emergent and exemplary). The rubric was used as an analytical tool that characterised, assessed and ascertained the changes in students’ problem-solving skills before and after the teaching intervention. The result shows that the intervention group made substantial improvement from about 89.75% at the level of no attempt and problematic response in the pre-test to 74.50% moved to the higher levels of emergent and exemplary. Based on the finding, it was concluded that the use of sequential multiple representations as a teaching strategy is an effective tool for enhancing students’ problem-solving skills in the context of electric circuit problems. The research recommends further research with different sets of students, and in different contexts across Nigeria to provide more empirical evidence on the role of sequential multiple representations as a means of developing students’ problem-solving skills in electric circuit problems.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adeyemo, S. A. (2010). Teaching/learning of Physics in Nigerian secondary schools: The curriculum transformation, issues, problems and prospects. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology. 1(1) 99-111 ISBN: 0976 4089

Erinosho, S. Y. (2013). How do students perceive the difficulty of physics in secondary school? An exploratory study in Nigeria. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 3(3), 1510-1515.

Haratua T. M. S. & Judyanto S. (2016). Representations Based physics Instruction to enable students problem-solving. American Journal of Educational Research, 2016 4(1), 1-4

Heckler, A. F. (2010). Some consequences of prompting Novice physics students to construct force diagrams. International journal of science education, 32(14), 1829-1851.

Heuvelen A. V. & Zou, X. (2001). “Multiple Representations of work-energy process” American Journal of Physics. 69(2), 184-194.

Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems. A hand book for designing problem-solving learning environments. (Routledge, New York).

Kohl, P. B. & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics, Physics Education Research, 4, 010111.

Kozma, R. (2013). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordance for science understanding. Learners Instruction. 13, 205.

Mekonnen, S. (2014). Problems challenging the academic performance of physics students’ in higher governmental institutions in the case of Arbaminch, Wolayita, sodo, Hawasa and Dila Universities. 6(5).

Metioui, A. C. (2012). Acquiring knowledge in learning concepts from electrical circuits. The use of multiple representations in technology-based learning environments. Systemic, Cybernetics and Informatics. 10(2). ISSN: 1690-4524

NECO (2015). Chief examiners report in Physics.

NERDC (2004) National Educational Research and Development Centre: National Policy on Education, Abuja: NERDC Press.

Rosengrant, D., Van Heuvelen, A. & Etkina, E. (2005). Free body diagrams: Necessary or sufficient. AIP Conference proceedings. 790(1)

Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions. A model of goal and theory description in mathematics education: The Wiskobas project. Dordrecht. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.