Dielectric Properties of Fresh Roma and Cherry Tomato Samples at Different Frequencies and Temperatures
Abstract
The dielectric properties of two different tomato varieties, Roma, and Cherry, were measured with an LCR meter, at 50 KHz, 90 KHz and 120 KHz frequencies. The measurement was carried out at 35 oC, 45 oC and 55 oC temperature. The tomato samples are obtained from the farm within nine days period, washed and sliced with sharp knife. Two samples of matured and pre-mature, from each of the varieties were used to prepare four fresh samples. The samples were loaded on test cell, connected to an LCR meter. The experimental result show that both dielectric constant and dielectric loss factor decreased with increasing frequency, for all the samples. As the temperature increases, dielectric constant was found to decrease, while the dielectric loss increases, for all the samples. Cherry was found to have higher dielectric constant and dielectric loss than Roma. At 50 KHz, for example, the dielectric constants for Cherry matured are 32.41, 31.68 and 30.44, for Roma matured are 25.66, 24.79 and 23.92, at 35 oC, 45 oC and 55 oC temperatures respectively. While the results also shows that, at 50 KHz, the dielectric loss for the pre-mature samples are 6.41, 7.75 and 8.91, for Cherry and 5.30, 6.10 and 7.57, for Roma, at 35 oC, 45 oC and 55 oC temperatures respectively, which indicated the increase in dielectric loss with increasing temperature. While the dielectric constant and dielectric loss decreases with increasing frequencies.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, F. S., Salik, N. K., Ambreen, S. and Justina, J. T. (2010). Effect of Packing Materials on Storage of Tomato, Mycopath Journal, 8(2) 85-89
Behdad B, Foodtech P and Mashhad J. (2015) Determination of Dielectric properties of tomato juice Relevant to microwave sterilization process. Journal of applied Environmental Biology Science, 4(115) 88-91.
Davies, J. N, and Hobson, G. E, (1981). The constituents of Tomato Fruit – The Influence of Environment, Nutrition, and Genotype. CRC Critical Review in Food Science and Nutrition, 15, 205-280.
Ebimieowei, E., and Ebideseghabofa, E. (2013).Postharvest Quality of Commercial Tomato (Lycoperscon Esculentum Mill) Fruits Brought into Yenagoa Metropolis from Northern Nigeria Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare Vol. 3 (11). Retrieved 22nd June, 2015
FAO. (2012). Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Statistical Database, 2012.http://faostat.fao.org
Food and Agricultural organization, (FAO) (2012). Analysis consumption of tomato in Nigeria. The Nigerian Agricultural Journal, 48 (2).
Joseph, A. (2019) Problem of tomatoes production in Nigeria, the varieties and types of tomato grown in Nigeria
Nelson, S.O. (2003). Frequency and temperature dependent permittivity of fresh fruits and vegetables from 0.01-1.8GHz Trans ASAE 46;567-574.
Olorunfemi S. and I.A. Ajibefun, (2007) Response of growth and yield characters of tomato verieties. The Nigerian Agricultural Journal, 48(2).
Piscitelli, C., Lavongna, M., De prisco, R., Coppola, E., Grilli, E., Russo, C., (2020). Tomato plants (Solanium lycoperisicum) grown in experimental contaminated and free radical scavenging evaluation.
Taylor, I. B, (1986) Biosystematics of the tomato, in Atherton, J. G, and J Rudich (eds.) The Tomato Crop; A Scientific Basis for Improvement, Chapman and Hall, New York, Pp 1-34.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.