Response Surface Optimization of Bioethanol Production from Sugar Bagasse by Aspergillus flavus
Abstract
Sugarcane bagasse presents an appealing opportunity as a bioethanol source due to its abundance, affordability, and renewable characteristics. Employing response surface methodology to optimize operational parameters affecting bioethanol production from sugarcane bagasse offers a cost-effective and efficient approach to enhance bioethanol yields. In this investigation, sugarcane bagasse served as the substrate for bioethanol production, with the microbial strain Aspergillus flavus being utilized. The study aimed to explore the impacts of temperature, pH, and inoculum concentration on bioethanol yield through a central composite design. The findings revealed that the optimal conditions for bioethanol production were observed at a temperature of 26°C, pH of 6, and substrate concentration of 50 g/L. Consequently, the projected bioethanol yield under these conditions reached 36.4 g/L. These results contribute valuable insights into the potential of sugarcane bagasse as a bioethanol feedstock, emphasizing the significance of optimizing process parameters to maximize yields. It is evident from this study that the optimization of process parameters plays a critical role in enhancing bioethanol yield from sugarcane bagasse. Furthermore, the study showcases the effectiveness of utilizing Aspergillus flavus as a microbial strain for bioethanol production.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Dias MO, Ensinas AV, Nebra SA, Maciel Filho R, Rossell CE, Maciel MR. Production of bioethanol and other bio-based materials from sugarcane bagasse: integration to conventional bioethanol production process. Chemical engineering research and design. 2009 Sep 1;87(9):1206-16.
Galbe M, Sassner P, Wingren A, Zacchi G. Process engineering economics of bioethanol production. Biofuels. 2007:303-27.
Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresource technology. 2010 Jul 1;101(13):4851-61.
Sarkar N, Ghosh SK, Bannerjee S, Aikat K. Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: an overview. Renewable energy. 2012 Jan 1; 37(1):19-27.
Amorim HV, Lopes ML, de Castro Oliveira JV, Buckeridge MS, Goldman GH. Scientific challenges of bioethanol production in Brazil. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2011 Sep;91:1267-75.
Alvarado-Morales M, Abd Hamid MK, Sin G, Gernaey KV, Woodley JM, Gani R. A model-based methodology for simultaneous design and control of a bioethanol production process. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 2010 Dec 9; 34(12):2043-61.
Cesaro A, Belgiorno V. Combined biogas and bioethanol production: opportunities and challenges for industrial application. Energies. 2015 Aug 5; 8(8):8121-44.
Guerrero AB, Ballesteros I, Ballesteros M. The potential of agricultural banana waste for bioethanol production. Fuel. 2018 Feb 1; 213:176-85.
Nanssou PA, Nono YJ, Kapseu C. Pretreatment of cassava stems and peelings by thermo hydrolysis to enhance hydrolysis yield of cellulose in bioethanol production process. Renewable Energy. 2016 Nov 1; 97:252-65.
Pereira LM, Milan TM, Tapia-Blácido DR. Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) to optimize 2G bioethanol production: A review. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2021 Aug 1; 151:106166.
Betiku E, Taiwo AE. Modeling and optimization of bioethanol production from breadfruit starch hydrolyzate vis-à-vis response surface methodology and artificial neural network. Renewable Energy. 2015 Feb 1; 74:87-94.
Manmai N, Unpaprom Y, Ramaraj R. Bioethanol production from sunflower stalk: application of chemical and biological pretreatments by response surface methodology (RSM). Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 2021 Oct;11:1759-73.
El-Mekkawi SA, Abdo SM, Samhan FA, Ali GH. Optimization of some fermentation conditions for bioethanol production from microalgae using response surface method. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 2019 Dec; 43:1-8.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.