Effects of Shared Reading and Conferencing on the Writing of Upper Basic Students in Kaduna State

Hafsat Usman Kasim, Habiba Mohammed

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of shared reading and conferencing on the writing of upper basic students in Kaduna State. Four objectives with corresponding research questions are formulated. The quasi-experimental design was adopted and contrasted with the traditional method of teaching to elicit the required information from 101 sampled students. The pre-test was administered and after four weeks, the post-test was administered to both the control and experimental groups. Mean and standard deviation are the main tools used to answer the research questions. Based on the above, the findings of the study reveal that the result of the post-test are significantly better than that of the experimental group in key areas associated with the different types of essays. As a consequence, the study concludes that alternative strategies can be successfully employed to teach writing at the basic levels. In line with its findings, the study recommends among others that teaching/ learning writing should be made an interactive process at this level.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullahi, T. (2013). Lecturer Notes: Composition and Summary. Memeographed.

Ade, L. (2018). The Effect of Using Shared Reading Strategy in Improving Reading Comprehension. Journal of Education Research, 24(2), 112-125.

Badaria, R. (2012). Teaching Vocabulary Using Shared Reading and Flashcards: A Comparative Study. Journal of Language Education Research, 10(3), 245-260.

Bradberry, S. (2013). Overview and definitions of rhetorical modes: the four traditional modes of discourse. www.discover.hubpages.com

Bus, A., van IJzendoorn, M., & Pellegrini, A. D. (1995). Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65, 1–21.

Caulfield, J. (2020). The four main types of essay: Quick guide with examples. www.Scribbr.com.

Education Department of Western Australia (2004): Reading resource book (2nd Ed). Port Melbourne: Rigby Heeneman.

Jia, X (2013). Application of classroom interaction and interest in English lesson

Kaalindi, S.C. (2005). The impact of the new primary reading programme on poor readers in Zambia. An M.Ed Dissertation, Lusaka University, Zambia

Keene, S. (2006). Conferencing: One of the Most Potent Tactics and an Indispensable Tool.

Leipzig, D.H. (2001). What is reading? www.readingrockets.org.

Myers, S.S. (2006). Performance in reading comprehension: Product or process. Educational Review, 43(3) 257-272.

Nordguist, R. (2013). Modes of discourse (composition). Glossary of grammatical and rhetorical terms.WWW.thoughtco.Com.

Oloson, D.R. (2023). Writing, history, styles, types, importance and faces. www.britannice.

Salawu, I.O. (2012). Introduction to teaching aids. In M. Ogunsanya (Ed); Basic process in Education. Oyo. Andenian Publication series.

Sénéchal, M. (2008). Testing the home literacy model: Parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 59–87.

Stahl, K. A. (2012). Complex text or frustration –level text: using shared reading to bridge the difference. The Reading Teacher, 66(1) 477-511.

Thomas, L. (2020). Quasi-experimental design, definition, types and examples. www.scribbs.com.

Williams, D. (1971). Reading; product and process in language use. Being a paper presented at the Dakota state College Reading Conference Madision: South Dakota, April, 20, 1971.

Word Press (2017). Conferencing with students. www.wordpress.com


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.