Impact of Simulation Models on Students’ Achievement and Retention of Cell Division Concept in Colleges of Education in North West, Nigeria
Abstract
This study investigated the NCE 1 students’ achievement and retention of cell division concept in biology when taught using computer simulation models. The research employed Pretest, Posttest and Retention test using one experimental group and one control group. A pretest was administered before the treatment to establish the equivalence of the experimental and control groups. The subjects in the experimental group were taught using Computer simulation model while those in control group were taught using lecture method. Cell Division Concept Performance Test (CDCPT) was used to obtain data from 176 NCE I biology students of Federal Colleges of Education in North west Nigeria consisting of 72 male and 104 female ; that made up the sample size using simple random sampling techniques. The instrument was validated by three PhD holders from the Department of Science Education, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, where the reliability coefficient of 0.75 was obtained. Three research questions and three null hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance. The major findings from the study revealed significant difference between the mean academic performance score of NCE I Biology students taught cell division concepts using computer simulation models and those taught the same concept using lecture method in favour of the experimental group. There is also significant difference in the retention ability of NCE I Biology students exposed to cell Division concepts using computer simulation models and those exposed to the same concept using lecture method in favour of computer simulation model. Based on the findings it was concluded that Students learn Cell Division concepts in biology better when taught using computer simulation model of  instruction at NCE I level. The computer simulation model of instruction affects the academic performance and retention ability of students positively when taught Cell Division concepts in biology better than lecture method. It was therefore recommended that Biology teachers should adopt the use of computer simulation model in teaching topics like Cell Divison at NCE 1 level since the findings revealed its effectiveness in enhancing academic performance and retention of concept learnt.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Araoye, M.I. (2013). Redressing Students’ Motivation and Academic Achievement in Biology Education at the Federal College of Education (Special) Oyo State, Nigeria. International Conference, New Perspective in Science Education. 2nd edition.1-6.
Chin, C. & Chia, L.G. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: Using Students' Questions to Drive Knowledge Construction. Science Education, 88(5), 707–727.
Çimer, A (2011).What Makes Biology Learning Difficult and Effective: Students’ Views Educational Research and Reviews 7(3), 61-71,
Clark, D.B., Nelson, B., Sengupta, P. & D’Angelo, C. (2009). Rethinking Science Learning through Digital Games and Simulations: Genres, examples, and evidence. [Online]. Paper Commissioned for the National Research Council Workshop on Gaming and Simulations, October 6-7, Washington, DC
Duyilemi, A.N., Olagunju, A.M. & Olumide, O.J. (2014). Effects of Computer Simulation Package, Gender and Parental Education on Nigerian Secondary School Students ’Attitude towards Biology.21st Century Academic Forum Conference Proceedings, Harvard, 114 -136.
Gambari, A, I., Yaki, A.A. & Olowe, T.T. (2013). Understanding the Concept of Digestive System in Biology Using Computer Simulation. Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 22(5).
İnce Aka, E., Güven, E. & Aydoğdu, M. (2010). Effect of Problem Solving Method on Science Process Skills and Academic Achievement. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(4), 13–25.
Kiboss, J.K., Ndirangu, M. & Wekesa, E.W. (2004). Effectiveness of a Computer-Mediated Simulation Program in School Biology on Pupils’ Learning Outcome in Cell. Theory. Journal of Science. Technology, 1: 2.
Olele, C. N. (2008). Emerging Issues for Computers in Schools: A Bridge for Digital Divide Phenomenon in Nigeria. In N. Udofia (Ed.). Proceedings of 49th annual conference of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria (STAN) Ibadan: HEBN Publishers Plc., 195-199.
Olubola, S. & Aladejana, F. (2013). Effect of Simulation Games and Computer Assisted Instruction on Performance in Primary Science. International Academic Conference Proceedings .Orlando USA.pp 10-15.
Mkpanang, J. T. (2010). Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) with Drill and Practice on Academic Achievement of Students in Physics. Nigerian Journal of Science and Science Education, 8 (2), 72-86.
Perkins, K.K. & Wieman, C.E. (2008). Innovative Teaching to Promote Innovative Thinking. In R. L. DeHaan & K. M. V. Narayan (Eds.), Education for Innovation: Implications for India, China and America .pp. 181–210.
Samikwo, D. C (2013). Factors Which Influence Academic Performance in Biology in Kenya: A Perspective for Global Competitiveness International Journal Of Current Research. 5, (12) 4296-4300.
Seyhan, H.G. (2015). The Effects of Problem Solving Applications on the Development of Science Process Skills, Logical Thinking Skills and Perception on Problem Solving Ability in the Science Laboratory. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 8-27.
Tuckman, B.W. (1975). Measuring Educational outcomes. Harcom Brace: Jeravack inc.
Wekesa, E.W. (2003). “Effects of a Computer-Based Instruction Module on Student’s Achievement, Perception of the Classroom Environment and Attitude Towards School Biology in Nakuru District, Kenya, â€Unpublished Master Thesis, Egerton University, Njoro, Kenya.
Wekesa, D.W., Wekesa E.W. & Amadalo, M.M. (2013). A Computer Mediated Simulation Module for Teaching Cell Division in Secondary School Biology. International Journal of Educational Research and Development. 2(5), 114-130.
Yusuf, M O. & Afolabi, A.O. (2010). Effects of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) On Secondary School Students’ Performance in Biology. Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., 9(1), 62-69.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.