Performance Measurement Indicators for Academic Staff in Nigerian Higher Institutions: A Case Study of ATBU Bauchi

Abdulsalami Ya'u Gital, Mustapha Abdulrahman Lawal, Mahmud Ahmed Usman, Ismail Zahraddeen Yakubu

Abstract


This study focuses on the development of a comprehensive Key
Performance Indicator (KPI) management system to evaluate
academic staff performance in Nigerian higher institutions, using
Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University (ATBU), Bauchi, as a case study.
The research aims to establish a holistic framework that considers the
diverse roles of academic staff, including teaching, supervision,
research, publication, consultancy, and service. A structured approach
was employed, involving the formulation of operational indicators
through stakeholder engagement via focus groups, workshops, and
collaborative discussions. The study utilized a Fuzzy Conjoint Model
to analyze the preferences and priorities of academic staff regarding
the proposed KPIs, ensuring alignment with their core duties and
institutional goals. Results reveal significant insights into the
prioritization of responsibilities, with teaching and research emerging
as primary areas of focus. The findings provide a foundation for a fair
and data-driven performance evaluation system tailored to the context
of Nigerian higher education, enhancing accountability and guiding
strategic decision-making in academic institutions.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Lazić, Z., A. Đorđević, and A. Gazizulina,

Improvement of quality of higher education

institutions as a basis for improvement of

quality of life. Sustainability, 2021. 13(8): p.

Mushemeza, E.D., Opportunities and

Challenges of Academic Staff in Higher

Education in Africa. International Journal of

Higher Education, 2016. 5(3): p. 236-246.

Cadez, S., V. Dimovski, and M. Zaman Groff,

Research, teaching and performance

evaluation in academia: the salience of quality.

Studies in Higher Education, 2017. 42(8): p.

-1473.

Lo-Iacono-Ferreira, V.G., S.F. Capuz-Rizo, and

J.I. Torregrosa-López, Key Performance

Indicators to optimize the environmental

performance of Higher Education Institutions

with environmental management system–A

case study of Universitat Politècnica de

València. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018.

: p. 846-865.

Eftimov, L., et al., Designing a balanced

scorecard as strategic management system for

higher education institutions: A case study in

Macedonia. Ekonomika, 2016. 62(2): p. 29.

Muda, I., Educational institution performance

measurement based on Miles and Huberman

models using balanced scorecard approach.

Calitatea, 2019. 20(170): p. 32-41.

Parmenter, D., Key performance indicators:

developing, implementing, and using winning

KPIs. 2015: John Wiley & Sons.

Mahmoud, A.S., et al., Key performance

indicators for the evaluation of academic and

research laboratory facilities. International

Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation,

37(2): p. 208-230.

Aithal, P. and S. Aithal, Key performance

indicators (KPI) for researchers at different

levels & strategies to achieve it. International

Journal of Management, Technology, and

Social Sciences (IJMTS), 2023. 8(3): p. 294325.

Oluwagbemiga, O.E. and A.O. Ajibike,

Adoption of balanced scorecard and nonfinancial

performance

of

tertiary

institutions

in

Nigeria.

Management

&

Accounting

Review

(MAR),

(1):

p.

-214.

Lanre, O.M. and A.T. Olufemi, Balanced

scorecard and private universities’

performance in South-Western, Nigeria.

Research Journal of Finance and Accounting,

10(8): p. 6-15.

Anuforo, P.U., H. Ayoup, and N. Saidu,

Balance Scorecard Implementation Challenges

in Institution of Higher Learning: Overview of

Prior Studies. American International Journal

of Social Science Research, 2018. 2(2): p. 111.

Rashidi, E., et al., A review of performance

management systems in higher education

institutions across the globe. Annals of Social

and Behavioural Sciences, 2022. 4(1).

Nura, A.A., Human resource management

practices and employee performance

management in Nigerian higher educational

institutions. 2014, Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Mntonintshi, O. and V. Mtembu, When

performance management fails: attitudes and

perceptions of staff at a Higher Education

Institution. Journal of Economics and

Behavioral Studies, 2018. 10(6A (J)): p. 131140.

Weerts, D.J. and L.R. Sandmann, Community

engagement and boundary-spanning roles at

research universities. The Journal of higher

education, 2010. 81(6): p. 632-657.

Bourke, A.G., Universities, community

engagement, and democratic social science.

Sarrico, C.S., Performance indicators in higher

education, in The International Encyclopedia of

Higher Education Systems and Institutions.

, Springer. p. 2219-2222.

Rubin, H.J. and I.S. Rubin, Qualitative

interviewing: The art of hearing data. 2011:

sage.

Sniukas, M. and M. Sniukas, Research design

and methodology. Business Model Innovation

as a Dynamic Capability: Micro-Foundations

and Case Studies, 2020: p. 45-65.

Stokes, D. and R. Bergin, Methodology or

“methodolatry”? An evaluation of focus groups

and depth interviews. Qualitative market

research: An International Journal, 2006. 9(1):

p. 26-37.

Brits, H. and L. du Plessis, Application of focus

group interviews for quality management: An

action research project. Systemic Practice and

Action Research, 2007. 20: p. 117-126.

Asquith, J.A.L., The effects of group size on

the outcome of focus group sessions.

Management Research News, 1997. 20(12): p.

-15.

Lindsay, A.C. and A.M. Hubley, Conceptual

reconstruction through a modified focus group

methodology. Social Indicators Research,

79: p. 437-454.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.