Multimodal Literacy and the Digital Humanities Intersection: A Transformative Approach for Higher Education

Charisa Dada

Abstract


Multimodal literacy—the ability to interpret and engage with multiple forms of communication, including visual, textual, digital, and auditory—has become an essential competency in higher education. This paper explores the role of multimodal literacy in contemporary learning environments, emphasizing its significance in preparing students for the modern workforce. The study applies key theoretical frameworks such as semiotics, transformative learning theory, multiliteracies framework, and multimodality, arguing that multimodal literacy enhances critical thinking, creativity, technological competence, and overall learning outcomes. Using the Digital Humanities (DH) course for Arts disciplines as a case study, this research examines student experiences, instructional challenges, and successes in multimodal learning. Findings reveal that while DH fosters intellectual engagement with digital tools, challenges such as digital literacy gaps, infrastructure limitations, and faculty readiness hinder its full potential. The paper concludes with recommendations for integrating multimodal literacy into the Nigerian higher education system to enhance student engagement and career readiness.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Cordes, S (2009). Broad Horizons: The Role of Multimodal Literacy in 21st Century Library Instruction. IFLA

Core Curriculum and Minimum Academic Standards (CCMAS: 2022). Arts CCMAS final, Abuja.

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Routledge.

Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social Semiotics. Polity Press.

Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 98-113). Routledge.

Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32, 241-267.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Kress, G. (2003). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Edward Arnold.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Open University Press.

Lemke, J L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J.R. Pedagogical Inquiry. 18.

Liu, A. (2017). The Future of the Digital Humanities: A Roadmap for the 21st Century. University of Michigan Press.

Mezirow, J. (1991b). Transformation Theory and Cultural Context: A reply to Clark and Wilson. Adult Education Quarterly, $!(3), 188-192. Doi: 10.1177/0001848191041003004

New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.

O'Toole, M. (2011). The language of display design. Routledge.

Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. W. Burks, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Saussure, F. de. (1916). Course in General Linguistics (C. Bally, A. Sechehaye, & A. Riedlinger, Eds.; W. Baskin, Trans.). Philosophical Library.

Thibault, P. J. (2000). Multimodal discourse: Towards a theory of text and image (Vol. 2). Continuum.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). The handbook of visual analysis. Sage.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.