Deep Learning Models for Air Quality Prediction using Satellite Images

Shahida Abdullahi Umar, Badamasi Imam Ya’u, Fatima Umar Zambuk

Abstract


According to World Health Organization, air pollution is considered to be one of the greatest environmental health threats. PM2.5, fine particles with a diameter that is generally 2.5 micrometers and smaller, is inhalable into the lungs and can induce adverse health effects. In order to mitigate the effects of PM2.5 on health outcomes, it is crucial to make accurate predictions of ambient concentrations. In the past, most studies developed traditional linear models from meteorological data or Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ambient air quality monitors. However, the non-linear relationship between PM2.5 and other factors impacts the effectiveness of the models. Some other barriers are the sparseness of air quality monitors and the limited data sources, which also hinder researchers’ ability to get accurate predictions. Recently, advanced technologies in satellite remote sensing have been widely used to estimate PM2.5 concentrations. The implementation of machine learning approaches has improved computational efficiency and accuracy. In this study, we used daily satellite imagery from January 2019 to October 2023 in 25 U.S. locations, and implemented an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm, a deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and a CNN-XGBoost pipeline to make predictions based on the extracted features from each satellite image and atmospheric information along with meteorological conditions. To evaluate the performance of each model, we used daily EPA Federal Reference Method PM2.5 measurements as the validation data, and calculated the corresponding root mean squared error (RMSE) and the coefficient of determinant (R2). After combining each daily observation from 25 locations, the XGBoost approach demonstrated the highest performance with an RMSE of 3.98 μg m−3 and an R2 of 0.65. The CNN-XGBoost pipeline, tending to overestimate PM2.5 concentrations, had an RMSE of 5.87 μg m−3 and an R2 of 0.37. In conclusion, our study showed that XGBoost achieved reasonable PM2.5 prediction performance, indicating that the application of satellite remote sensing data and machine learning approaches has significant potential use in PM2.5 concentrations prediction.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Borghi, Francesca et al. (2021). “Estimation of the Inhaled Dose of Pollutants in Different Micro-Environments: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” In: Toxics 9.6, p. 140.

Gao, Meiling, Junji Cao, and Edmund Seto (2015). “A distributed network of low-cost continuous reading sensors to measure spatiotemporal variations of PM2. 5 in Xi’an, China.” In: Environmental pollution 199, pp. 56–65.

Guo, Bin et al. (2021). “Estimating PM2. 5 concentrations via random forest method using satellite, auxiliary, and ground-level station dataset at multiple temporal scales across China in 2017.” In: Science of The Total Environment 778, p. 146288.

Johnson, Nicholas E, Bartosz Bonczak, and Constantine E Kontokosta (2018). “Using a gradient boosting model to improve the performance of low-cost aerosol monitors in a dense, heterogeneous urban environment.” In: Atmospheric environment 184, pp. 9–16.

Lin, Changqing et al. (2015). “Using satellite remote sensing data to estimate the highresolution distribution of ground-level PM2. 5.” In: Remote Sensing of Environment 156, pp. 117–128.

Liu, Wei et al. (2019). “Meteorological pattern analysis assisted daily PM2. 5 grades prediction using SVM optimized by PSO algorithm.” In: Atmospheric Pollution Research 10.5, pp. 1482–1491.

Stowell, Jennifer D et al. (2020). “Estimating PM2. 5 in Southern California using satellite data: factors that affect model performance.” In: Environmental Research Letters 15.9, p. 094004.

Wang, Wei et al. (2017). “Deriving hourly PM2. 5 concentrations from himawari-8 aods over beijing–tianjin–hebei in China.” In: Remote Sensing 9.8, p. 858.

Yang, Jun et al. (2013). “The role of satellite remote sensing in climate change studies.” In: Nature climate change 3.10, pp. 875–883.

Zheng, Tongshu et al. (2020). “Estimating ground-level PM2.5 using micro-satellite images by a convolutional neural network and random forest approach.” In: Atmospheric Environment 230, p. 117451.

Zhou, Xiaodan et al. (2021). “Excess of COVID-19 cases and deaths due to fine particulate matter exposure during the 2020 wildfires in the United States.” In: Sci


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.