Perils and Psychological Effects of Joined Supervision in Nigerian University

Aliyu Umar Abubakar, Ismail Suleiman, Ayuba Ibrahim Gezawa

Abstract


Key to putting forth a positive change in total migration from human cultural activities or myopic thinking in the aspect of socialization, religion and personal academic initiative was to pursue a doctoral study in various fields of knowledge. Though by experience and thought, the PhD journey and its supervision relationship has so many problems, difficulties and challenges around it, it requires constructive plans in managing it. Therefore this paper has grown to explain some of the perils of joint supervision against students (PhD) and the different styles with which students operate in managing the supervisor-student relationship. Especially nowadays that when closely observed the situation becomes too difficult and expensive. Therefore, it becomes a necessity if not obligatory for us to state or address this issue or tell all information that students might require most to have insight, capacity and confidence on how to go with their doctoral degree joint supervisors relationship. The outcome of some seminars delivered on the same topic brought tangible adjustment in student character and academic achievement. Finally, it would shed more light on students that have never come to terms with PhD and on those that went away indignantly, suffer or bitten out the certificate and left all they spent in vain. Indeed it can clear the doubt and offbeat ideas of the weak students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Batchelor, D. and Di Napoli, R. (2006). The doctoral journey: Perspectives. Educate, 6(1), 13-24.

Hodsdon, L. and Buckley, A. (2011). Postgraduate research experience survey: 2011 results. York: The Higher Education Academy

Janssen, A. (2005) Postgraduate research supervision: Otago students' perspectives on: - quality supervision; - problems encountered in supervision. Dunedin: University of Otago.

Kamler, B. and Thomson, P. (2006). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. Oxon: Routledge.

Land, R. (2008). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: A transformational model of learning. Retrieved from http://www.sddu.leeds.ac.uk/uploaded/learning-teaching-docs/teachtalk/5-12-2008/ray_land_presentation.pdf

Meyer, J. F. and Land, R. (2006). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. In J. H. F. Meyer, & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp.3-18). New York: Routledge.

Peelo, M. (2011). Understanding supervision and the PhD: Essential guides for lecturers. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Perkins, D. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In J. H. F. Meyer, & R. Land (Eds.) Overcoming Barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp.33-47). New York: Routledge.

Phillips, E. M. and Pugh, D. S. (2005). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors. Glasgow: Open University Press.

Vilkinas, T. (2008). An exploratory study of the supervision of PhD/research students’ theses. Innovative Higher Education, 32(5), 297-311.

Wisker, G. and Morris, C. (2010). ‘Nudging’: exploring effective strategies to enable postgraduate research students to cross conceptual thresholds in their doctoral work. Paper presented at the Third Biennial Threshold Concepts Symposium, University of New South Wales, Australia.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.