Performance Evaluation of Some Robust Estimators in the Presence of Outliers using a Default and Adjusted Turning Constant Values

S. Abdullahi, B. A. Rasheed, A. Ahmed

Abstract


This research work was conducted to evaluate the performance of S, M and MM robust estimators in the presence of outliers in regression model using a default and adjusted turning constant values of the Bisquare redescent weights, so as to see the impact of increasing or reducing the turning constant values on the resistibility of the robust estimators. Since it has been observed from the literature, that the previous researchers stick to the used of the default turning constant values despite the fact that the turning constant can be adjusted. A simulation study was used to compare the performance of the robust methods with five independent variables on the sample sizes 50, 150 and 300 respectively. The result of the study showed that increasing or decreasing the turning constant values for S and M estimators have a significant impact on the resistibility of the estimators on sample sizes 50, 150, and 300 respectively, while adjusting the turning constant value for MM-estimator has no impact on the robust regression result. The study also recommends that analyst should use smaller value than the default turning constant for M-estimation to have more resistibility against outlying observations in the regression models, because the smaller the turning constant value the more resistant the M-estimator. Secondly the study recommended that analyst should use a value greater than the default K value for the S-estimation, because the higher the turning constant the more resistant the S-estimator against outlying observations.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Begashaw, A. B. and Yohannes, Y. B. (2020). Review of outlier detection and identifying using robust regression. International Journal of Systems Science and applied mathematics. 5(1): 4-11.

Draper, N. R. & Smith, H. (1998). Applied Regression Analysis, Third Edition, Wiley Interscience Publication, United States, 1998.

Hampel, F. R., Ronchetti, E. M., Rousseeuw, P. J. and Stahel, W. A. (1986). Robust Statistics, the Approach Based on Influence Functions, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Huber, P. J. (1981), Robust Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Justo, C. E. and Calandra, M. V. (2021). Evaluation of Robust Linear Regression Methods for the Measurement of a Topographic Altimetric Network. A Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 8(4):30-39

Khan et al. (2021). Applications of robust regression techniques: An econometric approach. Journal of Hindawi Mathematical Problems in engineering, volume 2021, 9 pages.

Lianng Yuh and ViII A. Sullivan (2004). Robust Estimation Using Sas•Softvare, Department of Biostatistics Merrell Dow Research Institute Cincinnati, Ohio 45215 Mathsoft, Inc.Seattle, WA, 255-298.

Rousseeuw, P. J. and A. M. Leroy (1984), Robust Regression and Outlier Detection, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.

Ranjit, K. P. (2014), Some Methods of Detection of Outliers in Linear Regression Model, Iasri, Library Avenue, New Delhi-110012.

Salibian, M. and Yohai, V. J. (2006). A Fast Algorithm for S-Regression Estimates. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15, No. 2 (2006), 414-427.

Yuliana, S., Hasih, P. Sri, S. H., and Twenty, L. (2014) M-estimation, S-estimation, and MM-estimation in robust regression. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 91, 349-360.

Yuliana, A and Susanti, A. (2008). Estimasi M dan sifat-sifatnya pada Regresi Linear Robust, Journal of Math-Info, 1, No. 11 8-16.

Zaman, A., Rousseeuw, P. J., and Orhan. M., (2001). Econometric applications of high breakdown robust regression techniques, Economics Letters, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 1–8.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.