Performance Evaluation of Microbial Cementation in Soil Improvement Using Different Ureolytic Bacteria Species

Murtala Umar, Muttaka Na’iya Ibrahim

Abstract


The process of using microorganisms to improve the strength of residual soil is referred to as biocementation process. This technique utilizes the concept of microbial calcite precipitation to precipitates calcium carbonate into the soil matrix structure leading to the cementation of the soil particles and subsequent improvement in the strength and reduction of hydraulic conductivity. This research studied the performance of two bacteria species in the stabilization of residual soil via urea hydrolysis. The bacteria species used were Sporosarcina pasteurii and Klebsiella pneumoniae UM123 at concentrations of 1.20×106 cfu/ml and 1.80×106 cfu/ml and 1.5×105 cfu/ml and 2.9×106 cfu/ml respectively to evaluate the strength improvement of the residual soil. Similarly, cementation reagents used consists of urea and calcium chloride at 0.5M concentration. The study also employed treatment durations of 24, 36, 48, and 60 hours. The findings obtained demonstrated that higher concentrations of bacteria of 1.80×106 cfu/ml and 2.9×106 cfu/ml provided better strength improvement compared to lower concentrations of 1.20×106 cfu/ml and 1.5×105 cfu/ml for Sporosarcina pasteurii and Klebsiella pneumoniae UM123 species respectively. Thus, it was also found that as the bacteria cells concentrations are increased during biocementation process more calcite are precipitated leading to higher strength improvement with 2.2% being the highest strength improvement ratio obtained at 48 hours treatment duration for Sporosarcina pasteurii specie. Similar observations were made with Klebsiella pneumoniae UM123 with 2.1% being the highest strength improvement ratio recorded at 48 hours treatment duration.  Hence, the higher the amount of calcite precipitated the more the strength improvement up to 48 hours treatment duration for the two bacteria species. Therefore, at 48-hours of biocementation process, the strength of the soil had improved by 120% and 110% for Sporosarcina pasteurii and Klebsiella pneumoniae UM123 species respectively; compared to the untreated sample, representing the highest recorded strength improvement. Consequently, Sporosarcina pasteurii was found to performed better than Klebsiella pneumoniae UM123 in urea hydrolysis reaction and subsequent biocementation.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Benini, S., Rypniewski, W. R., Wilson, K. S., Miletti, S., Ciurli, S. and Mangani, S. (1999). A new proposal for urease mechanism based on the crystal structures of the native and inhibited enzyme from Bacillus pasteurii: why urea hydrolysis costs two nickels. Structure. 7(2), 205-216.

Cardoso, R., Pedreira, S.O.D., Duarte, G.A., Monteiro, A. (2020). About calcium carbonate precipitation on sand biocementation. Eng. Geol., 271 Article 105612, 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105612.

Cheng, L., Cord-Ruwisch, R. and Shahin, M. A. (2013). Cementation of sand soil by microbially induced calcite precipitation at various degrees of saturation. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 50(1), 81-90.

DeJong, J. T., Fritzges, M. B. and Nüsslein, K. (2006). Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 132(11), 1381-1392.

DeJong, J. T., Soga, K., Banwart, S. A., Whalley, W. R., Ginn, T. R., Nelson, D. C., Mortensen, B. M., Martinez, B. C. and Barkouki, T. (2010). Soil engineering in vivo: harnessing natural biogiochemical systems for sustainable, multi-functional engineering solutions. Journal of the Royal society Interface. rsif20100270.

De Muynck, W., De Belie, N. and Verstraete, W. (2010). Microbial carbonate precipitation in construction materials: a review. Ecological Engineering. 36(2), 118-136.

Gao, Y., Hua, C., Li, Y., He, J., Dai, Z., Shen, Y. (2022). Biological solutions for the remediation of cracks in ancient earthen structures: Experimental studies J. Mater. Civil Eng., 34 (11).

He, J., Fang, C., Mao, X., Qi, Y., Zhou, Y., Kou, H., Xiao, L. (2022). Enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation for the protection of earthen dikes and embankments under surface runoff: Laboratory investigations J. Ocean Univ. China, 21 (2) (2022), pp. 306-314.

Ivanov, V., Chu, J. and Stabnikov, V. (2015). Basics of construction microbial biotechnology Biotechnologies and biomimetics for civil engineering (pp. 21 56)Springer.

Karol, R. H. (2003). Chemical Grouting And Soil Stabilization, Revised And Expanded. (Vol. 12)CRC Press.

Lee, L. M., Ng, W. S., Tan, C. K. and Hii, S. L. (2012). Bio-Mediated Soil Improvement under Various Concentrations of Cementation Reagent. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 204, 326-329.

Liu, Y., Gao, Y., He, J., Zhou, Y., Geng, W. (2023). An experimental investigation of wind erosion resistance of desert sand cemented by soybean-urease induced carbonate precipitation Geoderma, 429.

Qi, Y., Gao, Y., Meng, H., He, J., Liu, Y. (2022). Biocementation via soybean-urease induced carbonate precipitation using carbide slag powder derived soluble calcium Geomech. Eng., 29 (1), pp. 79-90.

Rodriguez-Navarro, C., Jroundi, F., Schiro, M., Ruiz-Agudo, E. and González Muñoz, M. T. (2012). Influence of substrate mineralogy on bacterial mineralization of calcium carbonate: implications for stone conservation. Applied and environmental microbiology. 78(11), 4017-4029.

Soon, N. W., Lee, L. M., Khun, T. C. and Ling, H. S. (2014). Factors Affecting Improvement in Engineering Properties of Residual Soil through Microbial Induced Calcite Precipitation. Journal Geoenvironmental Engineering. 140(5).

Whiffin, V. S., van Paassen, L. A. and Harkes, M. P. (2007). Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique. Geomicrobiology Journal. 24(5), 417-423.

Yunusa, G. H., Kassim, A. and Gofar, N. (2015). Effect of Fine-Grained Soil Layer thickness on Performance of Modified Capillary Barrier System. Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering. 27(1), 24-46.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.