Development of a Distributed Energy-Aware Position Algorithm for Flying Ad-Hoc Network

Emmanuel K Akut, Aliyu D. Usman, Kabir A. Abubilal, Habeeb Bello, Ahmed T., John A. Bala, Unite A. Dogo, Augustine Zakka, Ezekiel Agbon

Abstract


The operational efficiency of FANET surveying a specific region is affected by the nature of the UAV's node placement, routing protocol, energy-aware task distribution, and node interaction amongst others. In this paper, three drones viz: Drone -1 (D-1), Master Drone (DM), and Drone 1 (D1) surveyed as FANET with DM aggregating packets from D-1 and D1 and communicating with the Static Ground Control Station (SGCS). The initial energy level of the drones’ batteries was assumed to be 95% to 100% full prior to take-off. The energy consumed by a flying drone is calculated using drag, lift, and transmitting/receiving energy usage. For the node exchange technique, a number of events that covered the surveillance distance were 350. The first swapping command is triggered when the DM depletes 40% of its energy, followed by a second swapping command upon an additional 20% energy loss. To mitigate the risk of UAV failure resulting from energy depletion during surveillance, the mission was aborted, and all three UAVs initiated a return-to-base protocol once the energy level of the UAV functioning as the DM reached or dropped below the designated edge energy level. 796.134 J was obtained as threshold energy. Results obtained for the throughput, end-to-end delay, and Packet Delivery Ratio was 0.2343 Mbps, 0.009 x 10-3 sec, and 88.76% respectively. The developed model supports energy-aware and position of the UAVs during surveillance. It provides a dynamic UAV node placement for pipeline surveillance and interaction-based task distribution for cooperative task sharing between the UAVs and SGCS.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aiello, G., Inguanta, R., D’Angelo, G., Venticinque, M. (2021) Energy Consumption Model of Aerial Urban Logistic Infrastructures. Energies 2021, 14, 5998. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185998

Akut E. K. et al., (2023) “Drone’s node placement algorithm with routing protocols to enhance surveillance” Intl. Journal of Elect. and Compt. Engr. (IJECE). 13(4), pp 4194 – 4203. doi: 10.11591/ijece.v13i4.pp4194-4203

Akut E. K. et al., (2023) “Energy-aware Message Distribution Algorithm for Enhance FANET Pipeline Surveillance Reliability” Sci. African Elsevier Journal. 20(2023) e01660, pp 1 – 14. doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01660

Antonio, G., Ana-Maria, M., Juan-Carlos, S., Maria-Dolores, C. (2021). A Comparative Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Flying Ad-Hoc Networks in Real Conditions. Applied Science 2021, 11, 4363. doi.org/10.3390/app11104363

Benyeogor, M., Olatunbosun, A. and Kumar, S. (2020). Airborne System for Pipeline Surveillance Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. European Journal of Engineering Research and Science. EJERS, 5(2), 178-182

Ding, G., Wu, Q., Zhang, L., Lin, Y., Tsiftsis, T. A., & Yao, Y. D. (2018). An Amateur Drone Surveillance System Based on the Cognitive Internet of Things. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(1), 29–35. doi:10.1109/mcom.2017.1700452

Fernandez, S. A., Carvalho, M. M. and Silva D. G. (2020). A Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithm for the Efficient Placement of UAVs. Algorithms 2020, 13, 323; doi:10.3390/a13120323

Fiedler, J. (2016). An Overview of Pipeline Leak Detection Technologies. asgmt.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/04.pdf . KROHNE, Inc. 7 Dearborn Road. Peabody, MA 01960.

Hu, Y., Zhang, F., Tian, T., and Ma, D. (2020). Placement Optimisation Method for Multi-UAV Relay Communication. IET Communication, 14(6), 1005-1015 doi: 10.1049/iet-com.2019.0518

Khan, I. U., Qureshi, I. M., Aziz, M. A., Cheema, T. A. and Shah, S. B. H. (2020). Smart IoT Control-Based Nature Inspired Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for Flying Ad Hoc Network (FANET). Special Section on Evolving Technologies in Energy Storage Systems for Energy Systems Applications. Doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2981531

Kochetkova, L. I. (2018). Pipeline monitoring with unmanned aerial vehicles. Journal of Physics: International Conference Series, 1015, 042021. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1015/4/042021

Pahlavan, K. & Levesque, A. H. (2005). Wireless Information Networks (2nd ed). John Wiley & Sons, 18-25.

Santos, G., Martins, J., Coelho, A., Fontes, H., Ricardo, M. and Campos, R. (2021). A Fast Gateway Placement Algorithm for Flying Networks. 2021 IEEE 93rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Spring), 1-6, doi: 10.1109/VTC2021-pring51267.2021.9448698.

Shrit, O., Martin, S., Al Agha, K. and Pujolle, G. (2018). A New Approach to Realize Drone Swarm Using Ad-Hoc Network. 16th Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (Med-Hoc- Net), 10.1109/MedHocNet.2017.8001645. hal-01696735

Shukla, A., Xiaoqian, H. and Karki, H. (2016). Autonomous Tracking and Navigation Controller for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Based on Visual Data for Inspection of Oil and Gas Pipelines. 16th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems.

Ullah, S. et al., (2022). Position-Monitoring-Based Hybrid Routing Protocol for 3D UAV-Based Networks. Drones, 6(11), 327, doi: 10.3390/drones6110327

Yang H. and Liu Z. (2019). An Optimization Routing Protocol for FANETs. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking. Doi: 10.1186/s13638-019-1442-0


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.